Yesterday, a discussion was started on the NCFUG "Talk" list concerning whether the user group should support ColdFusion 5 in presentations and meeting topics. There were a number of responses with some saying CF5 should no longer be covered and one or two asking specifically that CF5 be covered. My response to the e-mails is listed below. What are other user groups doing in this regard? Have you totally abandoned CF5 in your presentations/talks? Does it get "worked in" or mentioned where appropriate? I'd love to know what others think on this issue.

When it comes to user group presentations and general content of monthly meetings there is [essentially] only one driving factor: demand. Naturally, our focus is going to be on those topics that the majority of the user group has an interest in. For the most part, this has been, and will continually be, the latest and greatest Web development technology. Since most of us deal with Macromedia/Adobe products, and since we are an Adobe User Group, the focus will be on their products. The adoption of Adobe technology also drives the presentations and general content of the group. As more and more people become interest in new technology we will migrate our monthly meeting discussions accordingly.

That said, having our meeting content driven by specific, in-demand topics and not specific versions of software means we will "ride the fence" on occasion. For instance, Andy's suggestion of error management is something that naturally applies to any type of software development. In terms of ColdFusion, many of the ideas and strategies of error management can be easily applied to CF5 as well as CF7 - and in some cases the same exact way. So in discussing this topic, CF5 development will be covered, even if its not direct. Now, if you consider topics such as the Application Framework or Event Gateways in CF7, quite obviously CF5 will not be part of the discussion (and it shouldn't be).

Ostracizing developers who use older technology is not the issue or the focus. Instead, we will continue to provide relevant discussion on current technology while supporting older technology where possible and meaningful.

Aaron West's Gravatar
About this post:

This entry was posted by Aaron West on April 21, 2006 at 9:20 AM. It was filed in the following categories: User Groups, ColdFusion. It has been viewed 1923 times and has 4 comments.

4 Responses to Is ColdFusion 5 Relevant Anymore?

  1. Brian Rinaldi

    I think the question of is it relevant anymore and is it relevant as a user group topic are slightly different. I think many things are still relevant that may not be worthy of a topic for a user group discussion. Personally, I think CF5 is not relevant to a user group discussion topic as user groups (IMHO) work best when they promote up-to-date techniques and best practices. A user group is not there to support someone's legacy applications. That being said, the fact that many places may have legacy applications running on CF5 makes the software probably still relevant.

  2. Jack London

    I know lots of big companies which still have CF5 production server.

    I know some people who still use 286/386 PCs as a typewriter.

    It depends on what you need! :)

  3. Kevin

    User groups should decide based on majority what is necesary. Yes some of us have to support 5 and even 4.5 as we move to 7, but I rather not hear in a user group about the old rather give me further justifications to tell the boss why upgrading is necessary.

    Hey if I have a old CF question. I just ask.

  4. Jeff Houser

    I just landed a new project which was CF5. It is my fourth in the past year. I much prefer MX, but am not prepared to turn down CF5 work just yet (I'll wait until Adobe stops supporting it; which I assume will come with the release of CF8).

    This new project just prompted me to write an article for my CFDJ column about upgrading from CF5 to the MX codebase. I hate dealing with non-CFC based code.

    All that said, as a User Group Manager it depends what people are asking for. I like to concentrate on the latest and greatest; but it depends what people are asking for.